MBTI: Is The Myers-Briggs Test Meaningful Or Is It Just Pseudo-Science?

The MBTI tests have limited reliability and validity and is not sufficiently backed by scientific evidence. It is popular due to a cognitive bias called Barnum effect, which makes us gullible to vague descriptions of ourselves.

The comforting pseudoscience of the MBTI - Ness Labs

Pin by Trisha :) on Myers-Briggs Myers briggs type, Infp personality, Enfp personality

All About the Myers-Briggs (MBTI) Assessment

The MBTI is Nothing But Pseudoscience - Pepperdine Graphic

16 Myers-Briggs Personality Types: Which MBTI Personality Are You

Nothing personal: The questionable Myers-Briggs test, Science

The comforting pseudoscience of the MBTI - Ness Labs

MBTI Facts The Myers-Briggs Company

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)

How the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Works: 16 Personality Types

The Accuracy behind the Myers-Briggs Test

Pseudoscience Good. Scientific Validity Bad. : r/mbti

To what extent is the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator bs? Is there research supporting the idea that a person's MBTI can reliably predict something interesting about them? - Quora

Two Reasons Personality Tests Like Myers-Briggs Could Be Harmful

Myers-Briggs: Fad or Science? – Like An Anchor